My reaction to Ontario’s education reforms
July 6th, 2009It is no secret that I’m not at all a fan of the Ontario Liberals education initiatives. They campaigned on full day junior kindergarten and have further plans to continue along the “early education” path. In reading a recent article, this particularly part jumped out at me:
It recommends that Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty make the neighbourhood public school the hub of every community, where parents will get everything from prenatal advice and nutrition counselling to childcare for those under four, full-day kindergarten, and before and after school programming. Its doors would be open from 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., its hallways filled with parents, infants, school-age children and grandparents, Mr. Pascal said.
By placing all these services under one roof, parents can minimize the difficult transitions that disrupt their own lives and the lives of their children, while allowing teachers and early childhood educators to focus on a mixed program that in the long run will boost literacy, graduation rates and post-secondary participation, the report says.
I feel like I approach schooling and community from a completely different world view than our current provincial government. I don’t believe that the government or a school system should have control or even that significant of an influence over a family’s life.
In Deuteronomy 11, the Lord is exhorting his people. He begins with “Love the LORD your God and keep his requirements, his decrees, his laws and his commands always.” After continuing to encourage his people to obey Him, Deuteronomy 11:18-20 states, “Fix these words of mine in your hearts and minds; tie them as symbols on your hands and bind them on your foreheads. Teach them to your children, talking about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up. Write them on the doorframes of your houses and on your gates, so that your days and the days of your children may be many in the land that the LORD swore to give your forefathers, as many as the days that the heavens are above the earth.”
In Ephesians 6:4 we read, “Fathers, do not exasperate your children; instead, bring them up in the training and instruction of the Lord.”
Our God-given responsibility as parents is to train our children in the Lord. Frankly, that is not the job of the school system, nor does the public school system want it to be. The schools that the government runs are in the business of raising good citizens. The problem is that sometimes our definition of what a good citizen is is going to differ. Parents are entrusted with children, not the government and I don’t believe it is in the best interest of families to hand their young children over to any system. God choses parents for each unique child and handing jurisdiction over our children to others—even trained “professionals” cannot adequately replace what God has intended. The report even admits that some of the major goals are to “boost literacy, graduation rates and post-secondary participation”. While admirable, and really, nothing I’m prepared to argue against, these are goals that are for the good of the future of the province.
The trend towards “the earlier the better” for placing our children in the school system has been something that has concerned me for years. I have a solid conviction that children—especially small children, should be with their parents. I cannot fathom that it is better for a child of 3 or 4 to be in a class of 16-25 other children than it is to be at home. I cannot understand why artificial “playing house” could be considered better than a child standing on a stool beside Mommy learning what goes in the cookie batter next or that clearing a toy table is more educational than clearing a table with Grandma.
I’m also highly bothered by the idea that the school system should be offering prenatal and nutitional advice. I suppose since children are supposed to be spending so much time at schools rather than in their homes, it only makes sense under this plan but does this not raise alarm bells for anyone else? There are wildly varying schools of thoughts about nutrition and prenatal care in Canada. Which methodology will be adopted? What happens if a family’s personal philosophy in either area clashes with the standard advice? Is a standard going to be set that professionals know more than parents about their own children?
Maybe the thing that has me most disturbed is a new thought this article has generated: is a trend going to be set that community is something that should be formed and overseen by professionals? When I think about the utopian vision of “centres” that are “the hub of every community” it makes me feel frightened rather than excited. Have we thought about the implications of having state-raised children? Are we really going to be so quick to give up on what should be natural and normal: parents having responsibility for their own children from the earliest years onward?
At this point, I’m grateful for the limping economy that will keep these plans from being implemented in one large swoop. I’m hoping that it will buy time for parents to be educated that there are things more important than education and child-rearing being made “easier” by the government. I feel like I need to add a caveat to my thoughts: what I’ve shared is not criticism of parents who have made the choice to put their children into the school system. Though it is not my choice, and though my bias, as someone who strongly believes in home education, is obvious, I believe that it is the parent who should chose how their children get educated and trained, not the government. The educational ideology that the Ontario Liberals have been sharing over the last couple of years makes me wonder what they think the role of parents should be.
